Chapter 45 The Affidavit
Abridged
Text, followed by Abridger Notes, followed by multimedia, followed by Original
Text with deletions.
Chapter 45 The Affidavit
One or two very
interesting and curious particulars in the foregoing chapter, requires to be further
enlarged upon to take away any incredulity which a profound ignorance of the
entire subject may induce in some minds.
First: I have
personally known three instances where a whale, after receiving a harpoon, has
effected a complete escape; and, after an interval (in one instance of three
years), has been again struck by the same hand, and slain. In the instance
where three years intervened between the flinging of the two harpoons; the man
who darted them happening, in the interval, to go in a trading ship on a voyage
to Africa, with all the common perils incident to wandering in the heart of
unknown regions. Meanwhile, the whale he had struck must also have been on its
travels; no doubt it had thrice circumnavigated the globe, brushing with its
flanks all the coasts of Africa. This man and this whale again came together,
and the one vanquished the other. I was in the boat both times, first and last,
and the last time distinctly recognized a peculiar sort of huge mole under the
whale’s eye, which I had observed there three years previous.
Secondly: It is well known in the Sperm Whale Fishery, however ignorant the world ashore may be of it, that there have been several memorable historical instances where a particular whale in the ocean has been at distant times and places popularly cognisable. Why such a whale became thus marked was not altogether owing to his bodily peculiarities as distinguished from other whales; for however peculiar in that respect any chance whale may be, they soon put an end to his peculiarities by killing him, and boiling him down into a peculiarly valuable oil. No: the reason was this: that from the fatal experiences of the fishery there hung a terrible prestige of perilousness about such a whale insomuch that most fishermen were content to recognise him by merely touching their tarpaulins when he would be discovered lounging by them on the sea, without seeking to cultivate a more intimate acquaintance.
But not only did each
of these famous whales enjoy great individual celebrity—nay, ocean-wide renown;
not only was he famous in life and now is immortal in forecastle stories after
death, but he was admitted into all the rights, privileges, and distinctions of
a name; had as much a name indeed as Cambyses or Cæsar. Was it not so, O Timor
Jack! thou famed leviathan, scarred like an iceberg, who so long did’st lurk in
the Oriental straits of that name, whose spout was oft seen from the palmy
beach of Ombay? Was it not so, O New Zealand Tom! thou terror of all cruisers
that crossed their wakes in the vicinity of the Tattoo Land? Was it not so, O
Morquan! King of Japan, whose lofty jet they say at times assumed the semblance
of a snow-white cross against the sky? Was it not so, O Don Miguel! thou
Chilian whale, marked like an old tortoise with mystic hieroglyphics upon the
back!
I do not know where I
can find a better place than just here, to make mention of other things,
which to me seem important, establishing the reasonableness of the whole story
of the White Whale, more especially the catastrophe. So ignorant are most
landsmen of some of the plainest and most palpable wonders of the world, that
without some hints touching the plain facts, historical and otherwise, of the
fishery, they might scout at Moby Dick as a monstrous fable, or still worse a
hideous and intolerable allegory.
First: Not one in fifty of the actual disasters and deaths by casualties in the fishery, ever finds a public record at home. Do you suppose that that poor fellow there, who this moment perhaps caught by the whale-line off the coast of New Guinea, is being carried down to the bottom of the sea by the sounding leviathan—do you suppose that that poor fellow’s name will appear in the newspaper obituary you will read to-morrow at your breakfast? Yet I tell you that upon one particular voyage which I made to the Pacific, among many others, we spoke thirty different ships, every one of which had had a death by a whale, some of them more than one, and three that had each lost a boat’s crew. For God’s sake, be economical with your lamps and candles! not a gallon you burn, but at least one drop of man’s blood was spilled for it.
Secondly: The Sperm Whale is in some cases sufficiently powerful, knowing, and judiciously malicious, as with direct aforethought to stave in, utterly destroy, and sink a large ship; and what is more, the Sperm Whale has done it.
In the year 1820 the ship Essex, Captain Pollard, of Nantucket, was cruising in the Pacific Ocean. One day she saw spouts, lowered her boats, and gave chase to a shoal of sperm whales. Ere long, several of the whales were wounded; when, suddenly, a very large whale escaping from the boats, issued from the shoal, and bore directly down upon the ship. Dashing his forehead against her hull, he so stove her in, that in less than “ten minutes” she settled down and fell over. Not a surviving plank of her has been seen since. After the severest exposure, part of the crew reached the land in their boats.
At this day Captain Pollard is a resident of Nantucket. I have seen Owen Chace, who was chief mate of the Essex at the time of the tragedy; I have read his plain and faithful narrative; I have conversed with his son; and all this within a few miles of the scene of the catastrophe.
By a similar onset, some eighteen or twenty years ago Commodore J— then commanding an American sloop-of-war of the first class, happened to be dining with a party of whaling captains, on board a Nantucket ship in the harbor of Oahu, Sandwich Islands. Conversation turning upon whales, the Commodore was pleased to be sceptical touching the amazing strength ascribed to them by the professional gentlemen present. He peremptorily denied for example, that any whale could so smite his stout sloop-of-war as to cause her to leak so much as a thimbleful. Very good; but there is more coming. Some weeks after, the commodore set sail in this impregnable craft for Valparaiso. But he was stopped on the way by a portly sperm whale, that begged a few moments’ confidential business with him. That business consisted in fetching the Commodore’s craft such a thwack, that with all his pumps going he made straight for the nearest port to heave down and repair. I am not superstitious, but I consider the Commodore’s interview with that whale as providential. Was not Saul of Tarsus converted from unbelief by a similar fright? I tell you, the sperm whale will stand no nonsense.
Link to Chapter 46 Surmises.
Abridger Notes
Favorite lines and passages:
“This man and this whale again came together, and the one vanquished the other.” (reminding me of so many movies)
“Why such a whale
became thus marked was not altogether and originally owing to his bodily
peculiarities as distinguished from other whales; for however peculiar in that
respect any chance whale may be, they soon put an end to his peculiarities by
killing him, and boiling him down into a peculiarly valuable oil.” (destroying the person, the miracle, the
uniqueness)
“In
plain prose, here are four whales as well known to the students of Cetacean
History as Marius or Sylla to the classic scholar.” (a whale ship was my Yale and my Harvard)
“they
might scout at Moby Dick as a monstrous fable, or still worse and more
detestable, a hideous and intolerable allegory.” (and of course Moby Dick is full of allegorical elements)
ChatGPT 4o: Here are a few ways in which Moby-Dick functions as an allegory:
1. Ahab as a representation of obsession: Captain Ahab's pursuit of the whale can be seen as an allegory for the dangers of unchecked obsession. His relentless quest represents how an individual can be consumed by a singular idea or desire, ultimately leading to self-destruction.
2. Moby Dick as a symbol of the unknown: The white whale itself is often viewed as a symbol of the unknowable, the divine, or nature's power—something that defies human understanding and control. Ahab’s hunt for Moby Dick represents the human desire to conquer or understand that which is beyond our comprehension, whether it's the universe, fate, or God.
3. The crew as a microcosm of society: The diverse crew of the Pequod, with characters like Ishmael, Queequeg, Starbuck, and Stubb, can be seen as representing different aspects of humanity—ranging from the innocent to the morally conflicted, the spiritual to the material. Their interaction with Ahab and with the hunt for the whale reflects various philosophical and moral positions within society.
4. Nature and the divine: Throughout the novel, the sea and the whale are depicted as powerful forces beyond human control. The allegory can be interpreted as a commentary on humanity’s struggle against the vast, indifferent forces of nature, fate, or a higher power. The whale, in particular, might symbolize God or the universe—something both awe-inspiring and terrifying, that humanity cannot dominate.
In sum, Moby-Dick is rich with allegorical meaning, and many aspects of the novel can be interpreted as representing larger ideas, making it one of the great works of American allegory.
“Do you suppose that that poor fellow there, who this moment perhaps caught by the whale-line off the coast of New Guinea, is being carried down to the bottom of the sea by the sounding leviathan—do you suppose that that poor fellow’s name will appear in the newspaper obituary you will read to-morrow at your breakfast?” (a sentiment reminiscent of Bulkington)
“For God’s sake, be economical with your lamps and candles! not a gallon you burn, but at least one drop of man’s blood was spilled for it.” (a good point of discussion on the oil industry then and now)
“The Sperm Whale is in some cases sufficiently powerful, knowing, and judiciously malicious, as with direct aforethought to stave in, utterly destroy, and sink a large ship; and what is more, the Sperm Whale has done it.”
If someone were to reorganize Moby Dick, then perhaps placing this together with the earlier description of Sperm Whale vengefulness of Chapter 41 would be desirable. This discussion of ramming ships, as perhaps is Chapter 25 Postscript, may stem from the mechanics of written composition then, when returning to and revising earlier material may have been computationally more expensive.
“But he was stopped on the way by a portly sperm whale, that begged a few moments’ confidential business with him. … I consider the Commodore’s interview with that whale as providential. Was not Saul of Tarsus converted from unbelief by a similar fright? I tell you, the sperm whale will stand no nonsense.”
This was a good line to end the abridged chapter. And Mrs. Hussey didn’t suffer fools either. Women and whales.
Multimedia 45 The Affidavit
Original Chapter 45 The
Affidavit with Deletions
So far as what there
may be of a narrative in this book; and, indeed, as indirectly touching
one or two very interesting and curious particulars in the habits of sperm
whales, the foregoing chapter, in its earlier part, is as important a
one as will be found in this volume; but the leading matter of it requires
to be still further and more familiarly enlarged upon, in
order to be adequately understood, and moreover to take away any
incredulity which a profound ignorance of the entire subject may induce in some
minds, as to the natural verity of the main points of this affair.
I care not to perform
this part of my task methodically; but shall be content to produce the desired
impression by separate citations of items, practically or reliably known to me
as a whaleman; and from these citations, I take it—the conclusion aimed at will
naturally follow of itself.
First: I have
personally known three instances where a whale, after receiving a harpoon, has
effected a complete escape; and, after an interval (in one instance of three
years), has been again struck by the same hand, and slain; when the two
irons, both marked by the same private cypher, have been taken from the body.
In the instance where three years intervened between the flinging of the two
harpoons; and I think it may have been something more than that; the man
who darted them happening, in the interval, to go in a trading ship on a voyage
to Africa, went ashore there, joined a discovery party, and penetrated far
into the interior, where he travelled for a period of nearly two years, often
endangered by serpents, savages, tigers, poisonous miasmas, with all the
other common perils incident to wandering in the heart of unknown regions.
Meanwhile, the whale he had struck must also have been on its travels; no doubt
it had thrice circumnavigated the globe, brushing with its flanks all the
coasts of Africa; but to no purpose. This man and this whale again came
together, and the one vanquished the other. I say I, myself, have known
three instances similar to this; that is in two of them I saw the whales
struck; and, upon the second attack, saw the two irons with the respective
marks cut in them, afterwards taken from the dead fish. In the three-year
instance, it so fell out that I was in the boat both times, first and last,
and the last time distinctly recognized a peculiar sort of huge mole under the
whale’s eye, which I had observed there three years previous. I say three
years, but I am pretty sure it was more than that. Here are three instances,
then, which I personally know the truth of; but I have heard of many other
instances from persons whose veracity in the matter there is no good ground to
impeach.
Secondly: It is well
known in the Sperm Whale Fishery, however ignorant the world ashore may be of
it, that there have been several memorable historical instances where a particular
whale in the ocean has been at distant times and places popularly cognisable.
Why such a whale became thus marked was not altogether and originally
owing to his bodily peculiarities as distinguished from other whales; for
however peculiar in that respect any chance whale may be, they soon put an end
to his peculiarities by killing him, and boiling him down into a peculiarly
valuable oil. No: the reason was this: that from the fatal experiences of the
fishery there hung a terrible prestige of perilousness about such a whale as
there did about Rinaldo Rinaldini, insomuch that most fishermen were
content to recognise him by merely touching their tarpaulins when he would be
discovered lounging by them on the sea, without seeking to cultivate a more intimate
acquaintance. Like some poor devils ashore that happen to know an irascible
great man, they make distant unobtrusive salutations to him in the street, lest
if they pursued the acquaintance further, they might receive a summary thump
for their presumption.
But not only did each
of these famous whales enjoy great individual celebrity—nay, you may call it
an ocean-wide renown; not only was he famous in life and now is immortal in
forecastle stories after death, but he was admitted into all the rights, privileges,
and distinctions of a name; had as much a name indeed as Cambyses or Cæsar. Was
it not so, O Timor Jack! thou famed leviathan, scarred like an iceberg, who so
long did’st lurk in the Oriental straits of that name, whose spout was oft seen
from the palmy beach of Ombay? Was it not so, O New Zealand Tom! thou terror of
all cruisers that crossed their wakes in the vicinity of the Tattoo Land? Was
it not so, O Morquan! King of Japan, whose lofty jet they say at times assumed
the semblance of a snow-white cross against the sky? Was it not so, O Don
Miguel! thou Chilian whale, marked like an old tortoise with mystic
hieroglyphics upon the back! In plain prose, here are four whales as well
known to the students of Cetacean History as Marius or Sylla to the classic
scholar.
But this is not all.
New Zealand Tom and Don Miguel, after at various times creating great havoc
among the boats of different vessels, were finally gone in quest of,
systematically hunted out, chased and killed by valiant whaling captains, who
heaved up their anchors with that express object as much in view, as in setting
out through the Narragansett Woods, Captain Butler of old had it in his mind to
capture that notorious murderous savage Annawon, the headmost warrior of the
Indian King Philip.
I do not know where I
can find a better place than just here, to make mention of one or two
other things, which to me seem important, as in printed form
establishing in all respects the reasonableness of the whole story of
the White Whale, more especially the catastrophe. For this is one of those
disheartening instances where truth requires full as much bolstering as error.
So ignorant are most landsmen of some of the plainest and most palpable wonders
of the world, that without some hints touching the plain facts, historical and
otherwise, of the fishery, they might scout at Moby Dick as a monstrous fable,
or still worse and more detestable, a hideous and intolerable allegory.
First: Though most
men have some vague flitting ideas of the general perils of the grand fishery,
yet they have nothing like a fixed, vivid conception of those perils, and the
frequency with which they recur. One reason perhaps is, that not one in
fifty of the actual disasters and deaths by casualties in the fishery, ever
finds a public record at home, however transient and immediately forgotten
that record. Do you suppose that that poor fellow there, who this moment
perhaps caught by the whale-line off the coast of New Guinea, is being carried
down to the bottom of the sea by the sounding leviathan—do you suppose that
that poor fellow’s name will appear in the newspaper obituary you will read
to-morrow at your breakfast? No: because the mails are very irregular
between here and New Guinea. In fact, did you ever hear what might be called
regular news direct or indirect from New Guinea? Yet I tell you that upon
one particular voyage which I made to the Pacific, among many others, we spoke
thirty different ships, every one of which had had a death by a whale, some of
them more than one, and three that had each lost a boat’s crew. For God’s sake,
be economical with your lamps and candles! not a gallon you burn, but at least
one drop of man’s blood was spilled for it.
Secondly: People
ashore have indeed some indefinite idea that a whale is an enormous creature of
enormous power; but I have ever found that when narrating to them some specific
example of this two-fold enormousness, they have significantly complimented me
upon my facetiousness; when, I declare upon my soul, I had no more idea of
being facetious than Moses, when he wrote the history of the plagues of Egypt.
But fortunately the
special point I here seek can be established upon testimony entirely
independent of my own. That point is this: The Sperm Whale
is in some cases sufficiently powerful, knowing, and judiciously malicious, as
with direct aforethought to stave in, utterly destroy, and sink a large ship;
and what is more, the Sperm Whale has done it.
First:
In the year 1820 the ship Essex, Captain Pollard, of Nantucket, was cruising in
the Pacific Ocean. One day she saw spouts, lowered her boats, and gave chase to
a shoal of sperm whales. Ere long, several of the whales were wounded; when,
suddenly, a very large whale escaping from the boats, issued from the shoal,
and bore directly down upon the ship. Dashing his forehead against her hull, he
so stove her in, that in less than “ten minutes” she settled down and fell
over. Not a surviving plank of her has been seen since. After the severest
exposure, part of the crew reached the land in their boats. Being returned
home at last, Captain Pollard once more sailed for the Pacific in command of
another ship, but the gods shipwrecked him again upon unknown rocks and
breakers; for the second time his ship was utterly lost, and forthwith
forswearing the sea, he has never tempted it since. At this day Captain
Pollard is a resident of Nantucket. I have seen Owen Chace, who was chief mate
of the Essex at the time of the tragedy; I have read his plain and faithful
narrative; I have conversed with his son; and all this within a few miles of
the scene of the catastrophe.*
* [Melville's Note] The
following are extracts from Chace’s narrative: “Every fact seemed to warrant me
in concluding that it was anything but chance which directed his operations; he
made two several attacks upon the ship, at a short interval between them, both
of which, according to their direction, were calculated to do us the most
injury, by being made ahead, and thereby combining the speed of the two objects
for the shock; to effect which, the exact manœuvres which he made were
necessary. His aspect was most horrible, and such as indicated resentment and
fury. He came directly from the shoal which we had just before entered, and in
which we had struck three of his companions, as if fired with revenge for their
sufferings.” Again: “At all events, the whole circumstances taken together, all
happening before my own eyes, and producing, at the time, impressions in my
mind of decided, calculating mischief, on the part of the whale (many of which
impressions I cannot now recall), induce me to be satisfied that I am correct
in my opinion.” Here are his reflections some time after quitting the ship,
during a black night in an open boat, when almost despairing of reaching any
hospitable shore. “The dark ocean and swelling waters were nothing; the fears
of being swallowed up by some dreadful tempest, or dashed upon hidden rocks,
with all the other ordinary subjects of fearful contemplation, seemed scarcely
entitled to a moment’s thought; the dismal looking wreck, and the horrid aspect
and revenge of the whale, wholly engrossed my reflections, until day again made
its appearance.” In another place—p. 45,—he speaks of “the mysterious and
mortal attack of the animal.” [Melville's note, completed]
Secondly:
The ship Union, also of Nantucket, was in the year 1807 totally lost off the
Azores by a similar onset, but the authentic particulars of this
catastrophe I have never chanced to encounter, though from the whale hunters I
have now and then heard casual allusions to it.
Thirdly:
Some eighteen or twenty years ago Commodore J— then commanding an American
sloop-of-war of the first class, happened to be dining with a party of whaling
captains, on board a Nantucket ship in the harbor of Oahu, Sandwich Islands.
Conversation turning upon whales, the Commodore was pleased to be sceptical
touching the amazing strength ascribed to them by the professional gentlemen
present. He peremptorily denied for example, that any whale could so smite his
stout sloop-of-war as to cause her to leak so much as a thimbleful. Very good;
but there is more coming. Some weeks after, the commodore set sail in this
impregnable craft for Valparaiso. But he was stopped on the way by a portly
sperm whale, that begged a few moments’ confidential business with him. That
business consisted in fetching the Commodore’s craft such a thwack, that with
all his pumps going he made straight for the nearest port to heave down and
repair. I am not superstitious, but I consider the Commodore’s interview with
that whale as providential. Was not Saul of Tarsus converted from unbelief by a
similar fright? I tell you, the sperm whale will stand no nonsense.
I will now refer you to
Langsdorff’s Voyages for a little circumstance in point, peculiarly interesting
to the writer hereof. Langsdorff, you must know by the way, was attached to the
Russian Admiral Krusenstern’s famous Discovery Expedition in the beginning of
the present century. Captain Langsdorff thus begins his seventeenth chapter.
“By the thirteenth of
May our ship was ready to sail, and the next day we were out in the open sea,
on our way to Ochotsk. The weather was very clear and fine, but so intolerably
cold that we were obliged to keep on our fur clothing. For some days we had very
little wind; it was not till the nineteenth that a brisk gale from the
northwest sprang up. An uncommon large whale, the body of which was larger than
the ship itself, lay almost at the surface of the water, but was not perceived
by any one on board till the moment when the ship, which was in full sail, was
almost upon him, so that it was impossible to prevent its striking against him.
We were thus placed in the most imminent danger, as this gigantic creature,
setting up its back, raised the ship three feet at least out of the water. The
masts reeled, and the sails fell altogether, while we who were below all sprang
instantly upon the deck, concluding that we had struck upon some rock; instead
of this we saw the monster sailing off with the utmost gravity and solemnity.
Captain D’Wolf applied immediately to the pumps to examine whether or not the
vessel had received any damage from the shock, but we found that very happily
it had escaped entirely uninjured.”
Now, the Captain D’Wolf
here alluded to as commanding the ship in question, is a New Englander, who,
after a long life of unusual adventures as a sea-captain, this day resides in
the village of Dorchester near Boston. I have the honor of being a nephew of
his. I have particularly questioned him concerning this passage in Langsdorff.
He substantiates every word. The ship, however, was by no means a large one: a
Russian craft built on the Siberian coast, and purchased by my uncle after
bartering away the vessel in which he sailed from home.
In that up and down
manly book of old-fashioned adventure, so full, too, of honest wonders—the
voyage of Lionel Wafer, one of ancient Dampier’s old chums—I found a little
matter set down so like that just quoted from Langsdorff, that I cannot forbear
inserting it here for a corroborative example, if such be needed.
Lionel, it seems, was
on his way to “John Ferdinando,” as he calls the modern Juan Fernandes. “In our
way thither,” he says, “about four o’clock in the morning, when we were about
one hundred and fifty leagues from the Main of America, our ship felt a
terrible shock, which put our men in such consternation that they could hardly
tell where they were or what to think; but every one began to prepare for
death. And, indeed, the shock was so sudden and violent, that we took it for
granted the ship had struck against a rock; but when the amazement was a little
over, we cast the lead, and sounded, but found no ground.
*
*
*
*
*
The suddenness of the
shock made the guns leap in their carriages, and several of the men were shaken
out of their hammocks. Captain Davis, who lay with his head on a gun, was
thrown out of his cabin!” Lionel then goes on to impute the shock to an
earthquake, and seems to substantiate the imputation by stating that a great
earthquake, somewhere about that time, did actually do great mischief along the
Spanish land. But I should not much wonder if, in the darkness of that early
hour of the morning, the shock was after all caused by an unseen whale
vertically bumping the hull from beneath.
I might proceed with
several more examples, one way or another known to me, of the great power and
malice at times of the sperm whale. In more than one instance, he has been
known, not only to chase the assailing boats back to their ships, but to pursue
the ship itself, and long withstand all the lances hurled at him from its
decks. The English ship Pusie Hall can tell a story on that head; and, as for
his strength, let me say, that there have been examples where the lines
attached to a running sperm whale have, in a calm, been transferred to the
ship, and secured there; the whale towing her great hull through the water, as
a horse walks off with a cart. Again, it is very often observed that, if the sperm
whale, once struck, is allowed time to rally, he then acts, not so often with
blind rage, as with wilful, deliberate designs of destruction to his pursuers;
nor is it without conveying some eloquent indication of his character, that
upon being attacked he will frequently open his mouth, and retain it in that
dread expansion for several consecutive minutes. But I must be content with
only one more and a concluding illustration; a remarkable and most significant
one, by which you will not fail to see, that not only is the most marvellous
event in this book corroborated by plain facts of the present day, but that
these marvels (like all marvels) are mere repetitions of the ages; so that for
the millionth time we say amen with Solomon—Verily there is nothing new under
the sun.
In the sixth Christian
century lived Procopius, a Christian magistrate of Constantinople, in the days
when Justinian was Emperor and Belisarius general. As many know, he wrote the
history of his own times, a work every way of uncommon value. By the best
authorities, he has always been considered a most trustworthy and
unexaggerating historian, except in some one or two particulars, not at all
affecting the matter presently to be mentioned.
Now, in this history of
his, Procopius mentions that, during the term of his prefecture at
Constantinople, a great sea-monster was captured in the neighboring Propontis,
or Sea of Marmora, after having destroyed vessels at intervals in those waters
for a period of more than fifty years. A fact thus set down in substantial
history cannot easily be gainsaid. Nor is there any reason it should be. Of
what precise species this sea-monster was, is not mentioned. But as he
destroyed ships, as well as for other reasons, he must have been a whale; and I
am strongly inclined to think a sperm whale. And I will tell you why. For a
long time I fancied that the sperm whale had been always unknown in the
Mediterranean and the deep waters connecting with it. Even now I am certain
that those seas are not, and perhaps never can be, in the present constitution
of things, a place for his habitual gregarious resort. But further
investigations have recently proved to me, that in modern times there have been
isolated instances of the presence of the sperm whale in the Mediterranean. I
am told, on good authority, that on the Barbary coast, a Commodore Davis of the
British navy found the skeleton of a sperm whale. Now, as a vessel of war
readily passes through the Dardanelles, hence a sperm whale could, by the same
route, pass out of the Mediterranean into the Propontis.
In the Propontis, as
far as I can learn, none of that peculiar substance called brit is to be found,
the aliment of the right whale. But I have every reason to believe that the
food of the sperm whale—squid or cuttle-fish—lurks at the bottom of that sea,
because large creatures, but by no means the largest of that sort, have been
found at its surface. If, then, you properly put these statements together, and
reason upon them a bit, you will clearly perceive that, according to all human
reasoning, Procopius’s sea-monster, that for half a century stove the ships of
a Roman Emperor, must in all probability have been a sperm whale.
Comments
Post a Comment